External connection has 192.168.0.0/24 Subnet
Internal Connection has 192.168.10.0/24 & 192.168.11.0/24 Subnet
I have a windows Server with address 192.168.10.24.I have enabled the NAT under node...
CPUG: The Check Point User Group | |
Resources for the Check Point Community, by the Check Point Community.
| |
First, I hope you're all well and staying safe. | |
|
Type: Posts; User: ba3113
External connection has 192.168.0.0/24 Subnet
Internal Connection has 192.168.10.0/24 & 192.168.11.0/24 Subnet
I have a windows Server with address 192.168.10.24.I have enabled the NAT under node...
I have tried two address range one is belong to FW subnet and one is not belongs to but does not work in R77.30 but this combination works in R77.20
I have tried same secnario in R77.20 and looks like all NAT works (Automatic and manual) without any issue even SecureXL enabled so it means something not right with R77.30. Probably need some hotfix...
I tried all combination of Nat (Static , Hide) with Automatic and Manual.Manual NAT does not work at all but Automatic Nat work when disable SecureXL.
Yes Nat is not applying to traffic when SecureXL applied.I have simply configure Automatic Nat , static Nat , Manual Nat (Static , dynamic , PAT) I have tried all combination of NAT but NAT does not...
Yes Nat is not applying to traffic when SecureXL applied.I have simply configure Automatic Nat , static Nat , Manual Nat (Static , dynamic , PAT) I have tried all combination of NAT but NAT does not...
I am running Jumbo fix Take_185.Its normal HTTP,DNS and ping traffic.
We are doing some feature testing on R77.30 and found this problem
I am running R77.30 VSX Gateway on open server.When I have NAT Policy with SecureXL enabled the NAT Translation does not work.If I disable the SecureXL the NAT Translation works.
Has anyone come...