CPUG: The Check Point User Group

Resources for the Check Point Community, by the Check Point Community.


First, I hope you're all well and staying safe.
Second, I want to give a "heads up" that you should see more activity here shortly, and maybe a few cosmetic changes.
I'll post more details to the "Announcements" forum soon, so be on the lookout. -E

 

Search:

Type: Posts; User: ba3113

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    18
    Views
    9,031

    Re: NAT Issue with SecureXL

    External connection has 192.168.0.0/24 Subnet
    Internal Connection has 192.168.10.0/24 & 192.168.11.0/24 Subnet
    I have a windows Server with address 192.168.10.24.I have enabled the NAT under node...
  2. Replies
    18
    Views
    9,031

    Re: NAT Issue with SecureXL

    I have tried two address range one is belong to FW subnet and one is not belongs to but does not work in R77.30 but this combination works in R77.20
  3. Replies
    18
    Views
    9,031

    Re: NAT Issue with SecureXL

    I have tried same secnario in R77.20 and looks like all NAT works (Automatic and manual) without any issue even SecureXL enabled so it means something not right with R77.30. Probably need some hotfix...
  4. Replies
    18
    Views
    9,031

    Re: NAT Issue with SecureXL

    I tried all combination of Nat (Static , Hide) with Automatic and Manual.Manual NAT does not work at all but Automatic Nat work when disable SecureXL.
  5. Replies
    18
    Views
    9,031

    Re: NAT Issue with SecureXL

    Yes Nat is not applying to traffic when SecureXL applied.I have simply configure Automatic Nat , static Nat , Manual Nat (Static , dynamic , PAT) I have tried all combination of NAT but NAT does not...
  6. Replies
    18
    Views
    9,031

    Re: NAT Issue with SecureXL

    Yes Nat is not applying to traffic when SecureXL applied.I have simply configure Automatic Nat , static Nat , Manual Nat (Static , dynamic , PAT) I have tried all combination of NAT but NAT does not...
  7. Replies
    18
    Views
    9,031

    Re: NAT Issue with SecureXL

    I am running Jumbo fix Take_185.Its normal HTTP,DNS and ping traffic.
  8. Replies
    18
    Views
    9,031

    Re: NAT Issue with SecureXL

    We are doing some feature testing on R77.30 and found this problem
  9. Replies
    18
    Views
    9,031

    NAT Issue with SecureXL

    I am running R77.30 VSX Gateway on open server.When I have NAT Policy with SecureXL enabled the NAT Translation does not work.If I disable the SecureXL the NAT Translation works.
    Has anyone come...
Results 1 to 9 of 9