CPUG: The Check Point User Group

Resources for the Check Point Community, by the Check Point Community.


First, I hope you're all well and staying safe.
Second, I want to give a "heads up" that you should see more activity here shortly, and maybe a few cosmetic changes.
I'll post more details to the "Announcements" forum soon, so be on the lookout. -E

 

Search:

Type: Posts; User: Bob_Zimmerman

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    5
    Views
    3,996

    Re: Sync bonding?

    Thinking about it further, if a cable or transceiver fails, there would be a problem.

    If FW2LA to SS1 is down, FW1 won't know this, so it will keep sending traffic out FW1LA. SS1 will not be able...
  2. Replies
    5
    Views
    3,996

    Re: Sync bonding?

    Not doing 802.3AD. With this topology, the switches don't need to be aware of each other or of the fact that the endpoints are aggregating the link. 802.3AD is good for managing the aggregation state...
  3. Replies
    5
    Views
    3,996

    Re: Sync bonding?

    Either should work. I picked round-robin because I have had situations where I want more than 1g of sync capacity, but I've never needed more than 2g. Rather than burning a 10g interface for sync,...
  4. Replies
    5
    Views
    3,996

    Sync bonding?

    Sync is kind of a pain. People want to use a cable directly between the firewalls, but this can delay or even prevent proper automatic failover. When one firewall reboots, the other firewall sees its...
Results 1 to 4 of 4