do the :
dos2unix delete_host.py
Then try running your command again
CPUG: The Check Point User Group | |
Resources for the Check Point Community, by the Check Point Community.
| |
First, I hope you're all well and staying safe. | |
|
Type: Posts; User: abusharif
do the :
dos2unix delete_host.py
Then try running your command again
Yes, 7730 extension has occurred only once as you describe. This was due to pressure on Checkpoint by "big customers". I dont work for CP so no inside info here, but I know thats the reason from...
if the "sha 256" thing back in a day is any compass, it will be extended at least couple of more times ;-)
Install it via CPUSE which is preferred way of doing things
Instructions are outlined in:...
While you are at this topic, one things that annoys me is the custom RBA roles with for example Radius users.
add rba role MyRadiusRole virtual-system-access all
Will give access to all virtual...
That's a lot of active blades for 4400, as Shadowpeak says, you have memory issues, no doubt about that.
Yes sir!
Cool cyber ninja t-shirt ;)
Thanks Zimmie,
Correct, I wasn't able to find it in webui!
I've changed it now in VMX file
virtualHW.version = "10"
i am not able to reach my esx at the moment, but is it possible to "downgrade" compatibility mode/version of the VM (6>5) on the fly without need of re-installing?
I have that issue as well, but as the only, afaik, downside is a tad slower boot up sequence I never bothered trying to fix it.
Thanks for the tip!
What version are you running now? Vanilla R76SP?
Upgrade procedure was somewhat modified since initial release of R76SP.
Only time I had minor problems with upgrade was from vanilla R76SP (using...
I have no experience with sqlnet, but found this article
I guess(!) sqlnet2 CP predefined service should be used for redirected sessions (rewritten src/nat/port)?
...
Nothing new under the sun. Lab numbers you can easily divide with 3 to get somewhere near what appliances can perform.
As long as one comes to terms with that you will keep your sanity ;-)
Real...
Indeed it is, but in this specific case for retaining SPI's, procedure is same all the way up to and including r80.10, so it should be fine :p
Try this one:
downloads.checkpoint.com/dc/download.htm?ID=7853
These are used when you have 3rd party that is not respecting handling of SA's requested by the other side (if for example one side said delete SA and the other one just ignores it).
I've seen this...
Not sure if this critical problem for you at this point, but if you are under pressure to get it working you could try with following:
Global Properties > SmartDashboard Customization > Configure...
Glad to hear :)
Excellent, will try it out, thanks :)
So probably in this case this is due to that both AWS and Melbourne unit are managed from same Smartcenter = it wants to perform CRL check, which it will do from the Smartcenter IP/object.
I assume...
Thank for for elaborate answer, much appreciated!
Any way to force "sim vpn off" workaround to survive reboot?
SHA384 isn't viable in my specific scenario (due to limitations of supported "cipher...
Hi
What exactly is the error message?
I've deployed several VPN tunnels in similar manner and it worked fine, never had any certificate related error messages.
Anything blocking incoming...
Hi Shadowpeak,
Did you explore any deeper into multicore ipsec?
I've experienced and found out following
With securexl, decrypt/encrypt will be done by sxl instance. Once traffic is...
if you have smartview monitor, you can terminate connection for the user through the GUI
There is also client portion of 'vpn tu' command/menu which can reset ike/ipsec
1100 supports HA afaik, also described in the admin guide. Is it some specific clustering feature that makes you say it doesn't?
iirc they didn't have any file ending. It was upgrade scripts (bash) from early r76SP as well as TCL
One of the funniest occurrences was when we had upgrade fail with the snapshot image and the TCL...
Someone been lazy writing that (yet another) shell script. I've seen some shell scripts in early days of 61000 that would make baby jesus cry
Just remove that peer from community and push policy
Or route the VPN peers IP somewhere into dark dark place (unless managed by your smartcenter ofcourse)
Why do it the nice way that Shadowpeak...
Ah, great didn't know that. Thanks!
Checkpoints web visualization tool can do html, csv as well
edit: You didnt say which version you are running, but r80 can export from dashboard directly to CSV as well.
I am not aware of any additional fancy search filter in Tracker than that :(
If you haven't tried it yet, I would recommend giving smartlog a try instead. It's much much more flexible when it comes...
Well yes, thats one of the cluster VIP's. I assume you have more than one clustered interface though :-)
You can.
First of which tool are you using? With Smartlog you can enter something like src=192.168.1.0/24 or src=192.168.1.*
In Smartview tracker you can use 192.168.1.*
etc etc
In the Smartdashboard/Console, doubleclick on the Cluster object, go to Topology -> Edit and you will be able to see both the physical interface addresses as well as Cluster VIP's.
Or as I wrote,...
cli alternative, 'cphaprob -a if'
Weird response, I assume person that handled it can not confirm on their own if it should be changed or not.
I've used the feedback option 6-7 times and was never asked to create SR, but it was more...
As above, the one in $FWDIR/conf
Glad converter seem to work for you :)
I guess you already looked at this one: https://www.fortinet.com/products/next-generation-firewall/forticonverter.html
which vendor are you switching to? Maybe that vendor has some conversion scripts.
I've used confiz a lot but the other way around, migrating from Juniper to Checkpoint and it worked....fairly well...
for the objects, you should be able to right-click on the group in question inside the dashboard and export it (dont remember the file format).
From that file you should be able to script/pull out...
Are you sure that the downloaded file via wget is not UserCheck html code?
Do "cat" on the file and check the contents
Just saw the linkedin post by Moti Sagey that Barry passed away.
Sad news and I am sure he will be remembered, especially by this community as the founder of it.
May he rest in peace
I am seriously fed up with Check Points inability to fix something as simple as taking backup on the units.
Year after year, decade after decade its still lacking big time.
Not to mention like 10...
Silly question perhaps, but LOM is optional on most 5000 series of appliances. Is the appliance ordered with optional LOM card? (afaik the physical port is there even on units without it)
That sounds great! :)
Friend of mine was there and apparently he met you.........well he said you scanned his QR code, which I guess in todays society means friends for life ;)
Hmm Neon lights and all....you sure its the conference center you're at? :)
Kidding aside, too bad I had to skip CPX this year, would be nice to finally meet Phoneboy and Eric. (met Valeri in...
Adding/Deleting services should be covered by verification process. If you think about adding overlapping services, verification would normally complain about "Match for any" etc.
So that should be...
what does the following commands say
'tecli show statistics" (last part "Last Sharing Suceeded")
Otherwise check sk83520 which covers different check point URL's, among others threat...
Thanks was starting to doubt myself :)
I *think* I read somewhere about a way to disable verification, (maybe by Shadowpeak) but can't remember where.....and my googling skills have let me down for past 15 minutes.
offtopic
Regarding...
No problems :) Lot of helpful people in the community, but I doubt many are Italian speaking :(
Non parlo italiano, ma cercherò di rispondere con qualche aiuto da google translate.
1. Siete corretti, configurate i nodi di cluster (gateway) con routing IP ecc.
Assicurarsi di aver impostato...
Go with upgrade_export
Ah thats a shame, but hey compared to previous versions, what they have done up till now is huge step in right direction :)
Thanks for confirming this :)
ps. Also, if i recall correctly,...
I am still on EA from December/Jan, in that one it wasn't possible to use zones in NAT policy. Is that still the case in the newer builds?
Are you trying to change the VSX gateways management IP?
If so, follow the procedure in sk92425, "How to change the Management IP addresses assigned to VSX cluster and VSX cluster members in Gaia...
You are running version that supports virtual switches? IIRC R76SP.10 or later
How is your licensing? VSW won't consume a VS license, but maybe it causes issue with creation additional VS* besides...
Hi, can you check and share contents $FW_BOOT_DIR/ha_boot.conf file?
Yepp, that is correct, more info in sk25977
Obviously distribution of load would be horrible in scenario of single session host to host. You need meshed traffic to reach those impressive numbers and acheive spread.
But, as this is what you...
Looking forward to it!
Officially, 13k appliances never supported -HA either (based on quote tool / pricelist, such SKU simple do not exist visible for the customer or when ordering).
If you ordered 2 standalone 13k...
Just to be PITA, yes generally its like that and been so for many years, however SOME appliance bundles (VSX) still have the -HA SKU's for appliances AND blades for these (in my case 13xxx...
As Valeri mentioned I don't think there is market for this.
After 17 years more or less with Check Point and 100s of customer I've never come across someone using or asking for used unit to have in...
is ip forwarding active (since you unloaded the policy)?
Perform:
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
If it says 0, do:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
IIRC log file in older version of agens should be in $DADIR/bin and was called Da.out or something like that.
But yeah, try the manual upgrade with RPM as described in the knowledgebase, never seen...
It has been more than 15 years since i touched URI resources in CP, but yes it could be done IIRC. But its a bad bad legacy feature, so just don't go that way and listen to the gentlemen that...
Sometime it will get stuck...
I've seen many reasons to this...too many too remember. You can check the size of the deployment agent log file...if its at 2 gig, stop the da service, remove it, start...
He probably ment "fw ctl pstat" or "fw stat"
Right click on the group in question and choose export.
Save the file somewhere (its a text file)
From there you can use whatever tool you feel comfortable with to filter out the IP's
It wouldn't be the first time they are somewhat delayed.
If you need it right now, use following identifier: Check_Point_R77_30_JUMBO_HF_1_Bundle_T178_FULL.tgz
They do have 16 core license, SKU CPSG-P1607
Regarding R80.10 (gateway side) there is EA for it right now. Check Point "requirement/wish" during EA is that its deployed in production environment. ...
nice one :)
Indeed, but it's kind on unreliable as monitoring if you have gateways with perhaps somewhat static rulebase (where you don't push policy often).
Since you mentioned it, maybe same warning message...
I am not 100% sure, but I don't think such alert/monitoring function exists in CP.
However simple bash script parsing the output of the above command and sending you an e-mail should be fairly...
You can check it out via command line cpca lscert command (or something similar) or by activating web base ica management tool
More info: sk39915
Could be yes. There is a setting for that IIRC that gives you possibility of choosing which interfaces "management" is allowed via as well as IP addresses and/or subnets
sk39345 will give you the answer.
In short, it is not supported.
Yeah its a tricky one as you have limited amount of ports to play with, different amount of instances on each scenario (installation) so its hard to give a spot-on recommendation to what values...
It can be problematic in traffic intensive scenarios. As cciesec mentioned it depends a bit on securexl and amount of corexl instances as pre-defined amount of ports is split across the instances.
...
Second that....I use it for regular log files as well ($FWDIR/log)...it takes care of itself :)
From cost perspective I would say check out Check point life cycle management service.
Fixed price for policy conversion which is very cheap compared to time you need to put in to do it yourself.
A...
any of the permanent tunnel limitations that apply to your setup (77.20 for 1100)
check sk105380
115200 8N1
Got only cpuinfo from 1470
processor : 0
model name : ARMv7 Processor rev 4 (v7l)
Speed : 1.7GHz
Features : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp neon vfpv3 tls vfpv4...
1. Just a "shell" where "all" commands entered through it will be distributed on your chassis (plural). By this I mean all the SGM's
2. Not sure what you mean by "close"?
3. Yes there is expert...
Uhm what? My point was about amount of accelerated traffic vs non-accelerated. So medium-path and f2f would benefit of more corexl instances, while accelerated traffic would benefit of SND's/SXL.
...
Phoneboy is right, however in my own tests with a 2200 (which has same cpu as 4200), I still benefit of CoreXL since 99% of my traffic is not in fast path and I get lower throughput with corexl...
nice one, could help a lot when preparing policies!
haha....I guess "my firewall just went tits up" is a legit phrase now!
Thats my understanding as well
I just uploaded the image of how it looks in my MLOGS container. DMNLOGS on bottom was the one i added
1147
Ok maybe a misunderstanding here :p
Thats what I tried to say, I used DMN-LOGS to create a Domain Log Server (CLM......CLM as in CMA's logging counterpart) and that I doubt you can use DMN-LOGS for...
R77.30
In my case this was, as you say, to add another CLM in already existing MDL.
I didn't try, but I doubt that DMN-LOGS can be used to create new MDLogserver (its one of those "loose blades"...
Hi
CPSM-MLOGS-10 can be extended with more than 10, initially included CPSB-DMNLOGS-F licenses.
Just did this couple of days ago once all 10 included licenses were used and added brand new...
lol almost spilled my coffee reading your "toilet" comment on Linkedin :)
Monthly as in every 5-7 weeks (rumor).
I don't consider it to be too often. We can still make choice whether to apply or not (based on what content of it actually fixes) and when.
Less individual...
Just as a side note regarding "Instance is currently fully utilized". String was not exactly like the ones you are showing but more of "1_1 fwd instance is currently...." (don't have the exact string...
Remember the R77.30...announced at CPX as stability release with few new features. We're at take 150+ of the Jumbo, nuff said ;-)
Nah, all kidding aside, its good that they release Jumbos...