CPUG: The Check Point User Group

Resources for the Check Point Community, by the Check Point Community.


Tim Hall has done it again! He has just released the 2nd edition of "Max Power".
Rather than get into details here, I urge you to check out this announcement post.
It's a massive upgrade, and well worth checking out. -E

 

Search:

Type: Posts; User: tomersole'

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    2
    Views
    961

    Re: Can we login to Postgresql of R80.10?

    It is not advised to log directly into the underlying data.

    1. it is not audited
    2. it is unsafe and can cause side effects regarding the persistence of the data
    3. check point does not...
  2. Re: New install CP Management Server R80.10

    Hi, I will really appreciate if you can open a support ticket for this. We have people that are trained for problems like these. This is obviously not the expected behavior and we would like our...
  3. Re: have you ever seen this and how do you go about solving it?

    Hi, thank you for this feedback. Can you please message me the ticket number so I will check whether someone is looking at its root cause?
  4. Re: IPS Protect internal hosts only - recommendation

    you guys should really check the IPS features of R80.20 (sorry for plugging CheckMates): auto updates, tagging, auto prevent, picking countries in the access control policy (not IPS but still), ...
  5. Replies
    2
    Views
    2,645

    Re: Object color

    Hi, I wanted to clarify why we did this starting in R80.

    We wanted to use the opportunity of rethinking security management and give a refresh on the colors, make the names more user friendly -...
  6. Replies
    18
    Views
    2,206

    Re: R80.20.M1 Management Release

    Merged Back is not the correct term. We cut the R80.20 branch at a specific point and after good EA score, stabilize it (both in the R80.20 branch and in the M branch) and make it GA after it passes...
  7. Replies
    18
    Views
    2,206

    Re: R80.20.M1 Management Release

    I'm going to lurk in this thread for questions...
    What's New In SmartConsole: https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/SmartConsole/WhatsNew.html



    We are introducing a new release strategy....
  8. Replies
    7
    Views
    2,751

    Re: SmartDashboard on macOS

    we do care.

    https://[your management server IP]/smartview

    https://www.checkpoint.com/products/saas-security/

    https://community.checkpoint.com/thread/5344-the-smp-security-management-portal
    ...
  9. Re: Problem solved!!

    Hi, I saw your case. This is expected to be available for everyone in the next R80.10 Jumbo Hotfix that will be released, both at the website and through the "updates" page in web UI of the...
  10. Re: Confirm Policy Override Question/Problem

    Hi, I will really appreciate if you could open a task for this so that Check Point Support will be able to identify the cause for this.
  11. Re: pre upgrade check - INSPECT manual changes

    have you ever modified implied_rules.def manually?
    these modifications do not survive upgrades. it is a warning, not an error, you can continue upgrading, but that data will be lost unless you back...
  12. Re: Domain Objects in R80.10 and above - sk120633

    Why didn't we automatically upgrade all domain objects?
    - Because you may still have policies pre-R80.10 which still use them or plan to use them in pre-R80.10 policies.
    - Because syntax of the...
  13. Replies
    13
    Views
    2,154

    Re: R80: object explorer: unused objects

    Not sure if I emphasized this, we are working to change this behavior in our next releases. I know it doesn't help much right now, but still, thought you should know.

    The "either in SmartDashboard...
  14. Replies
    13
    Views
    2,154

    Re: R80: object explorer: unused objects

    Hi guys, Where Used in R80.10 will not signal that a host which has automatic NAT properties is "used" in the NAT policy. Even though a side-effect of deleting that host will be removal of 2...
  15. Replies
    13
    Views
    2,154

    Re: R80: object explorer: unused objects

    In that case, in R77.30 as well as R80.10 the automatic NAT rule would have been automatically deleted. Was that the case?
  16. Replies
    13
    Views
    2,154

    Re: R80: object explorer: unused objects

    Hi,

    Unused objects are not used. So you can safely delete them. Especially with the built-in validations mechanism of R80 - you will never end up with broken links.

    One small thing - amount of...
  17. Replies
    3
    Views
    864

    Re: SmartEvent gone in R80

    it received the biggest improvement out of all R80 features. find it under Logs & Monitor + "new tab".
  18. Re: Can someone explain the sub-section and Inline layer concept with CP R80.10

    yes, this is on the roadmap.
  19. Replies
    12
    Views
    2,159

    Re: R80.10 performance on standalone 4200

    Hi, that thread seemed pretty done to me as Yaelle from CP gave her answer. If you feel like this doesn't address the needs, please reply over there.
  20. Re: Stateful Ispection Status on Gateway - Drop out of state TCP

    Compliance blade.

    feedback is welcome
  21. Replies
    5
    Views
    4,259

    Re: Exporting Objects from Management Server

    Also SmartConsole GUI in R80+ is full of "Actions-->Export..." buttons which export the data to CSV.
  22. Replies
    7
    Views
    2,233

    Re: R80.10- Policy Disappearing- Please help

    Hi, I would like to better understand this, are you using R80.10 SmartConsole? Because some of the actions that you described aren't mentioned there - "save", "refresh", "clone an action". Did you by...
  23. Replies
    9
    Views
    2,472

    Re: Many problems with R80

    Hi guys, I want to respond to some of the specific issues that you have mentioned.

    The following items were addressed directly and fixed/greatly improved in R80.10:
    - chances of spontaneous...
Results 1 to 23 of 25