Search:

That will probably not happen as long as it is ARM and not X86.

But even the 1400s won't get the new R80.20 release!

Found this: https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&solutionid=sk157412

On the CP webpage and in some SKs I found references about a CP 1500 SMB device, does anybody have more information about it?

The newest R77.20 build (.81) is no longer supported on the 600/1100 series and SK137212 clearly states:

"Important: this and future releases do not support 600/1100 appliances.
The supported...

Can you tell me which edition of NSX you used - I guess you need the advanced edition at least?

The lastest FW is 8.2.64, to be found here:...

I fully agree - especially as the maintainer does not accept error reports, if they do not fit in his mindset...

The original idea of sytemd from svc from Solaris is great, the implementation is in Linux is a shame.

I just noticed on the CP hompage, that EOS for embedded R77.20 has been pushed from 05/19 to 05/20.

Yes it is in EA now.

Rumors are, that VDSL is in EA now.

In R80.10 you have to use GUIDBEdit to set the magic, if you don't want/cannot use the auto mode.

See...

I guess, that if you have several cluster, which see each other, it is still better to set the magic byte - now done by GuiDBEdit.

R77.20.70 is out!

Found it strange to have new builds only mentioned in the small print, instead of releasing a .61 and .62.

Yes it is fixed on the 1400 - I just tested it, the answer only comes, when the request is sent from the same VLAN.

I will have to test it, from the dhcpd version it should be fixed so.

The 1100 did not show that bug directly as it has a different kernel.

:) I understood from your post, that you are with CP - no worries.

Could you trigger the update please?

In R77.20.60 for the 14x0 the new DHCPD is included (4.3.5), for the 11x0 it is still the old one.

CP3200:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 77
model name : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU C2558 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 8
cpu...

Just received the info, that our 3200 have to get exchanged. Obviously due to the Atom bug from Intel.

Just saw, that PoE ist now available on the 1470 and 1490 (but not on the 1430/1450) for an extra $300.

Still no sign of VDSL.

Checkpoint told us, that there will be Small Appliances with PoE and VDSL, is there any timeframe for it?

Thanks and lets hope it will be fairly quick.

When will this happen and did our case trigger it?

We tried that as well.

Yes, they recommend to do an RFE...

Sure, I just did it to prove the error. Not to use the binary in production (it is a POC installation anyhow).

Yes thats what I did - crosscompiled the new DHCPD, put it on the 14xx and voila it worked.

The bug is fixed in 4.3.2:

": ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/4.3.2/dhcp-4.3.2-RELNOTES

"
- Modified...

No it is not a configuration issue. The supporter just did not get the main issue.

In the configuration (which works on the 1100 with an older Linux kernel), that we want to use there is no VLAN...

OK I will - thank you.

Yes 4.0.0b3 is used in Embedded Gaia.

I forwarded youthe SR#.

Here is the correct behaviour with an updated DHCPD:

/tmp/dhcpd -d -cf /etc/dhcpd.conf.LAN15 -lf /var/dhcpd.leases.LAN15 -pf...

On the 14xx there exists a problem with VLAN-handling and DHCP.

If you have an interface which gets VLAN-tagged traffic, the DHCP-server for the untagged interface answers the request.

It is...

The R80.10EA release notes clearly state, taht IP appliances are not supported.

No from MR4.

We have a couple of 290s runnig at IPSO 6.2MR5 with R77.30, it works fine, only installation with QoS takes about 5 minutes.

Yes, but not via clish, but in the config file in normal ISC syntax.

Finally they found it.

CP support is about twice as expensive.

Works fine with R77.30 and 2GB (with IPSO).

We have an old one with Nokia SKU, and with yearly renewal we always got the Essential support.

According to a paper I found, th xx0 should still a under Essential support, unlike the xx5, which...

Is the essential support for the IP290 still avilable and if not, which support levels are?

I sent you our SR #.

It is out now: https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&solutionid=sk105379

When you have a rule which is expired in your ruleset, you will receive a warning during installation. Is there a way to suppress these warnings?

At the moment the installation on the 1100 crashes on R76 for us.

Will CP offer a special trade in for these?

per today e.g.:
IP690 Successor Product Available May, 2007 IP650 3-Jun-2013 3-Jun-2016 3-Jun-2018 R76, 6.2; R70, R71, R75 & current HFAs

We received a HF now.

OK - thanks for the reference.

The feeling and fear, that if QA is so bad, that other fundamental bugs are overseen as well.

This is a bug in a fundamental syscall.

This bug did not appear under any other Splat version we used so far.

A not working basic syscall is a major issue, case is open.

pscp does not work either.

Fix is in R75.46 or you can work around it by:
Switching WinSCP to SCP and uncheck the optimize buffer option.

It is fixed in R75.46.

One work around is to switch WinSCP to SCP and uncheck the optimize buffer option.

The same happens with a fresh R76 Splat installation.

We upgraded from R75.45 to R76 (Splat to Splat), everything seems to work, but file ownership and group information is not resolved any more, but shown in numeric form.

ls -asl
total 24
4...

For those who haven't noticed already, CP removed the last Solaris support with R76.