CPUG: The Check Point User Group

Resources for the Check Point Community, by the Check Point Community.


First, I hope you're all well and staying safe.
Second, I want to give a "heads up" that you should see more activity here shortly, and maybe a few cosmetic changes.
I'll post more details to the "Announcements" forum soon, so be on the lookout. -E

 

Search:

Type: Posts; User: griff0001

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Re: RX-DRP / RX-OVR (FIFO Errors) / ClusterXL State change during policy install

    I thought I would share the update as it may help anyone that comes across this problem in the future.

    After amending the allocation of CPU cores for the SecureXL / CoreXL instances to 6/6 and...
  2. Re: RX-DRP / RX-OVR (FIFO Errors) / ClusterXL State change during policy install

    @jflemingeds Thanks for the input. Regarding your observation of the active member utilizing 700 meg more than the standby, I'm not experienced enough to know if this is normal behavior in a VRRP...
  3. Re: RX-DRP / RX-OVR (FIFO Errors) / ClusterXL State change during policy install

    Many thanks for the response. I know I had a lot of questions there. I also need to say that your book is top class!

    I can confirm that CPUs 4-11 rarely dip below 80% idle (even during peak I will...
  4. RX-DRP / RX-OVR (FIFO Errors) / ClusterXL State change during policy install

    Hi,

    I wonder if anyone could provide a fresh perspective on an issue I'm currently seeing on our VRRP 12600 cluster (running take 292).

    I have been spending some time running through Tim Hall's...
Results 1 to 4 of 4