CPUG: The Check Point User Group

Resources for the Check Point Community, by the Check Point Community.


First, I hope you're all well and staying safe.
Second, I want to give a "heads up" that you should see more activity here shortly, and maybe a few cosmetic changes.
I'll post more details to the "Announcements" forum soon, so be on the lookout. -E

 

Search:

Type: Posts; User: jladojam

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Re: How to move existing CMAs/MDS to bonded interface

    Thanks for the response. Look like there could be a decision of not going ahead since we're already have remote HA setup for the MDS so there's no single point of failure in the solution....
  2. How to move existing CMAs/MDS to bonded interface

    Hello Everyone,

    I need to move the existing MDS single interface to a bonded interface on a Smart-1 appliance with 2 CMAs. Has anyone done this that can share the experience?

    I'm using R75.2...
  3. Re: Changing interface from ethx to bond0 for Provider-1 NGx R65

    Hi,

    Did you manage to find an answer to your question? I have an existing provider-1 setup with 2 CMAs and I want to move to a bonded setup but not sure about the steps to prevent any lose. Any...
  4. Replies
    5
    Views
    4,396

    Re: Which rule design is better

    Hi,

    Thanks for your quick response. I agree with you about the two rules option is easier to see. For performance impact, do you know which one is better?


    Thanks
    James
  5. Replies
    5
    Views
    4,396

    Which rule design is better

    Hi,

    I would like to know which of the following scenario would be better for Checkpoint firewall to process its rule.

    Scenario 1 - this has 4 combination of flows but only two are used. This...
Results 1 to 5 of 5