Whew, good, you understood. I thought maybe I was being too subtle again. :-)
Ray
CPUG: The Check Point User Group | |
Resources for the Check Point Community, by the Check Point Community.
| |
First, I hope you're all well and staying safe. | |
|
Type: Posts; User: RayPesek
Whew, good, you understood. I thought maybe I was being too subtle again. :-)
Ray
And to further expand on my displeasure, today there is a security alert sitting in my Inbox for some HTTP protections not working. It 'is a "high" rating, meaning we must apply it. Guess what step 6...
And I would be very disappointed if you didn't. :-)
Unfortunately your use of the word "current" best describes our use case. It came down to a number of things:
Check Point was five years...
If you need to do a good job on content security, a dedicated proxy will always beat the stuff-everything-in-one-box products like Check Point. By good job I mean things like:
Fast MITM SSL...