CPUG: The Check Point User Group

Resources for the Check Point Community, by the Check Point Community.


First, I hope you're all well and staying safe.
Second, I want to give a "heads up" that you should see more activity here shortly, and maybe a few cosmetic changes.
I'll post more details to the "Announcements" forum soon, so be on the lookout. -E

 

Search:

Type: Posts; User: jdmoore0883

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    31
    Views
    23,559

    Re: ClusterXL Issue with Failover

    A - Yes, among many other tests as well. They also completely removed one of the switches to verify no single point of failure, and the Sync and Cluster continued to operate properly/as expected.
    ...
  2. Replies
    31
    Views
    23,559

    Re: ClusterXL Issue with Failover

    A - Personally, myself, with equipment at my immediately disposal? No. I don't have the personal funds to do so, and as a mere Diamond Engineer here at Checkpoint, we haven't got quite THAT level of...
  3. Replies
    31
    Views
    23,559

    Re: ClusterXL Issue with Failover

    sk92804: Sync Redundancy in ClusterXL

    In short, bond some interfaces, set that bond to be the Sync, set each physical of the bond to different switches on the same VLAN/broadcast domain.
Results 1 to 3 of 3