| CPUG | |
| The Check Point User Group | |
| A Resource For The Check Point Community. Fast. Useful. Independent. | |
|
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| I need to set up a VPN between out CP Site London and a Cisco PIX Site USA. 1st Scenario USA (Ua and Ub) need to access 2 servers ( a and b) in London 2nd Scenario London servers ( a and b) needs to access 2 other server ( U1 and U2 ) in USA I have created 6 nodes and put nodes a and b into group ab and nodes Ua and Ub into Grp Uab and nodes U1 and U2 into group U12 The following rule base have been set up source <> dest Uab <>ab<>xvpn<>svc<>accept ab<>U12<>xvpn<>svc<>accept In creating the Interoperable devices for USA FW, I put the groups Uab and U12 into yet another group ( USAgrp) and place this as the vpn domain. Question 1? Is this allowed and is it correct?. This is because I need the FW to work for both set of USA grps. Question 2? As at now that the above has been configured with just one group in the VPN domain, the VPN is not being formed at all. I have enabled ping and I can see ping from ab getting to the U12 but being dropped. What am I doing wrong? Encryption being used are IKE - 3DES, MD5 IPSEC - AES128, MD5 IPSEC (Phase 2) - se PFS, Group 2, 1024 bits Thanks for your help. Last edited by 1q2w3e; 2006-02-22 at 01:54. |
| |||
| Answer to Question 1: Yes that is good. Answer to Question 2: Need more information. Is the tunnel being formed or do you see SA errors? Are the pings being encrypted? What is the drop message exactly? |
| |||
| Do you use Cisco samples from http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk58...800ef796.shtml ? That one is straight forward. |
| |||
| Thanks The tunnel is not being formed at all. We are NOT using the traditional mode so on the Checkpint NG FW1/VPN1 AI, there is no where for me to specify that I am connecting to a PIX FW. I am using a Site to Site Star configuration. The ping is from a default deny all inthe last rule. Thanks |
| |||
| I advise you to use Subnet to Subnet encryption rules instead of host to host. This type of rules are easy to maintain and troubleshoot. Use Access-Lists (or PIX) and rule base on CP to restrict communication to host-to host. PIX to CP vpn definitely works. A lot of peoples already did it (simplified or traditional mode). Use demo stand to test it. It is not hard to find $500 worth PIX501 What version of PIX you are using? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |