| CPUG | |
| The Check Point User Group | |
| A Resource For The Check Point Community. Fast. Useful. Independent. | |
|
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| hi cpusers, can anybody tell me what performance I can expect per VS on a M8 appliance? No numbers just theoretically: If I only run ONE VS at the beginning, is this process running on one core or on all (multithreading?)? If I run multiple VSs, is it possible to assign different cores to different VSs? What release is available at the moment? Equador? thanks, gnjb |
| |||
| VSX's Firewall kernel is not multi-threaded and is monolithic across all VSes. SecureXL & Performance pack are multi-threaded and will take advantage of the multi-core/CPUs in the M8 |
| |||
| FW kernel is uniprocessor one and shared between different VSs. SecureXL uses other CPUs, but please check all the limitations fro SecureXL, there are many. Valeri Loukine CCMA-0019 Quote:
|
| |||
| I would run R65 I had a lot of issues with R60 and using Dell I ran into server crashes all the time. I just upgraded to R65 on the Dell 2850 platform and it seems much better all around. One of my Dell clusters in hot-standby does about 15 - 20 million connections a day, with 10 vs's and an evr and it handles it really well, I would think the M8 would kick butt. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |