| CPUG | |
| The Check Point User Group | |
| A Resource For The Check Point Community. Fast. Useful. Independent. | |
|
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Halo everyone.. I need a very details comparison between FW 4.1 and NGX R65.. I am not very familiar with FW 4.1 cos i never use it b4.. I really need this comparison to brief customer.. Appreciate is you guys can help me out... m Thank you |
| |||
| v4.1 came out on 1999, that should be all you need to tell your customer really. The main things I remember from 4.1: - NAT was still complex to do - Still had the old part numbers and module names (like 4.0) - GUI was composed of Policy Editor, Log Viewer and System Status (so much easier to understand than now) - Floodgate started working a lot better (stability much improved) - Performance improved - Sync between clusters better, but still too slow for me to recommend anything but HA PS It's EOL for ages and also EOS, so not really recommended Last edited by MarioL; 2008-07-09 at 03:34. |
| |||
| Hi MarioL, Thank you once again for replying me. The criteria that you mention, which 1 is for NGX R65 ? Are the following for NGX R65 ? :- - GUI was composed of Policy Editor, Log Viewer and System Status (so much easier to understand than now) - Floodgate started working a lot better (stability much improved) - Performance improved - Sync between clusters better, but still too slow for me to recommend anything but HA Appreciate your help. |
| |||
| lol, but true... __________________ There's no place like 127.0.0.1 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |