CPUG

The Check Point User Group

A Resource For The Check Point Community.  Fast.  Useful.  Independent.

1. CCSA/CCSE One-Week Dual-Certification Training Course with CPUG in San Francisco!
    Courses Starting 11/3, 12/8, (2009) 1/19, 2/9, 3/9, 4/6, 5/4, 6/8, 7/6, 8/3, 9/7.
2. Join Us On LinkedIn - We now have a CPUG group.


Go Back   CPUG: The Check Point User Group > Check Point Firewall-1/VPN-1 And Related Products > Topology Issues
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2007-02-28
dfwboiler dfwboiler is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 2007-01-21
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 0
dfwboiler has an average reputation (10+)
Default Anyone ever use proxy arp like this...

So....
Problem is I've got someone submitting requests to new NATs on the firewall trying to mimic a current proxy arp setup.
Here's the info on proxy arp that's working.

network: 200.200.200/24
firewall interface eth1: 200.200.200.5/24

Now, switch between network and firewall is set to forward all traffic to the firewall. So hosts on 200.200.200/24 do NOT talk to each other.
Firewall proxy arps and then NATs both the source and destination.
In other words, firewall will see traffic from 200.200.200.55 going to 200.200.200.61. It will proxy arp for .61, and then NATS both src and dst and sends it out eth3.

Now, they're trying to do the same on eth1 with a 100.100.100/24 network. This time it goes through a switch and then a router before going to the firewall.
Traffic flow:
100.100.100/24 >> switch configured to send all traffic to router >> router (firewall facing interface 200.200.200.3/24) >> firewall (router facing interface 200.200.200.5/24)
Again, they want the firewall to arp for addresses on 100.100.100/24 and then to NAT the src and dst. Now, I can't proxy arp for 100.100.100/24 because my interface is 200.200.200.5/24.


So, is their second scenario even possible? And out of curiosity, have you ever setup something like in the first scenario?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 2007-05-07
dsb.nepo dsb.nepo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-04-30
Location: Europe, Germany
Posts: 143
Rep Power: 3
dsb.nepo has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: Anyone ever use proxy arp like this...

never tried such a setup
Quote:
Again, they want the firewall to arp for addresses on 100.100.100/24 and then to NAT the src and dst. Now, I can't proxy arp for 100.100.100/24 because my interface is 200.200.200.5/24.
What Platform/OS is this firewall running?

With splat (verified R60-R65) there is a interesting solution to do proxy arp,
this is described in CluserXL_UserGuide (search for 'Example of Cluster Addresses on Different Subnets' or 'local.arp')
Quote:
When using static NAT, the cluster can be configured to automatically recognize the
hosts hidden behind it, and issue ARP replies with the cluster MAC, on their
behalf. This process is known as Automatic Proxy ARP. If you use different subnets
for the cluster IPs, this mechanism will not work, and you must configure the proxy
ARP manually. This is done by creating a file called local.arp, under the firewall's
configuration directory ($FWDIR/conf). In SmartDashboard, uncheck Automatic proxy
arp.
Each entry in this file is a triplet, containing the:
• host address to be published
• MAC address that needs to be associated with the IP address
• unique IP of the interface that responds to the ARP request.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 16:57.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0