CPUG

The Check Point User Group

A Resource For The Check Point Community.  Fast.  Useful.  Independent.

1. CCSA/CCSE One-Week Dual-Certification Training Course with CPUG in San Francisco!
    Courses Starting 12/8, (2009) 1/19, 2/9, 3/9, 4/6, 5/4, 6/8, 7/6, 8/3.
2. Join Us On LinkedIn - We now have a CPUG group.


Go Back   CPUG: The Check Point User Group > Check Point Firewall-1/VPN-1 And Related Products > SmartView Tracker/Logging And Alerting
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2008-06-03
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 2008-06-03
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
jaandrade3rd has an average reputation (10+)
Default Tracking: User Information

Many of the rules in our CP policy have Track set to Account. Although, the Record Details has a lot of information--the User field is always blank. Is there a way to populate this information?

We are a Microsoft shop and CP can talk to Active Directory.

TIA
Joe
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 2008-06-04
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2007-01-18
Location: London
Posts: 375
Rep Power: 2
MarioL has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: Tracking: User Information

Track set to "Account" only means that the firewall will keep track of packets and bytes sent. That's how it works and another important thing to consider is that is degrades performance, so you might want to set it to "Log".

If you want to get user information on the logs, you need to create rules with authentication actions, rather than "Accept".

Anyway, if you are a MS house, what about having an ISA internally doing authentication and logging and then just allow that though the firewall? You can either put a good caching proxy upstream of the ISA, or even use it for caching too.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 2008-06-04
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 2008-06-03
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
jaandrade3rd has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: Tracking: User Information

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarioL View Post
If you want to get user information on the logs, you need to create rules with authentication actions, rather than "Accept".

Anyway, if you are a MS house, what about having an ISA internally doing authentication and logging and then just allow that though the firewall? You can either put a good caching proxy upstream of the ISA, or even use it for caching too.
Created a rule with Source 'IE-Users@any' and Action 'User Auth' but the test PC nevers seems to hit the rule. The PC hits the last rule (source/destination 'ANY' action 'drop') and is prompted for authentication. In Checkpoint, IE-Users is a member of 'LDAP Groups'. In Global Properties|SmarDirectory (LDAP) does the 'Use SmarDirectory for VPN-1 gateway need to be selected for this to work? We do not want to manage LDAP/Active Directory through the Checkpoint, only retrieve information.

We are moving away from ISA servers because it impedes much of our internal traffic and is recommended by examiners.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 17:46.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0