CPUG

The Check Point User Group

A Resource For The Check Point Community.  Fast.  Useful.  Independent.

1. CCSA/CCSE One-Week Dual-Certification Training Course with CPUG in San Francisco!
    Courses Starting 12/8, (2009) 1/19, 2/9, 3/9, 4/6, 5/4, 6/8, 7/6, 8/3.
2. Join Us On LinkedIn - We now have a CPUG group.


Go Back   CPUG: The Check Point User Group > Check Point Firewall-1/VPN-1 And Related Products > SmartDefense
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2007-08-11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-09-26
Posts: 822
Rep Power: 3
cciesec2006 has an average reputation (10+)
Default SmartDefense and blocking FTP "known ports"

Redhat_VSFTPD_Server---CP_FW---Gentoo_Linux_Client

The checkpoint firewall is running IPSO 4.1 build 33
with NGx R61 with HFA_02. It is being managed by
a Provider-1 (SPLAT) NGx R61 with HFA_02. There is
no NAT on the firewall, just routing.

I enable SmartDefense on the CMA to block all known
ports for FTP. I have a very simple rule:

Any Any FTP accept log

On the FTP Server, I modified the vsftpd.conf
file to allow passive mode and specify the passive
range between 1520 and 1800. After that, I
restarted the vsftpd daemon (service vsftpd restart).

Now from the gentoo linux client, I perform ftp
connection (ftp 192.168.15.10) to the ftp server
with a valid account on the ftp server:

Gen2Linux ~ # cd /tmp
Gen2Linux tmp # ftp 192.168.15.10
Connected to 192.168.15.10 (192.168.15.10).
220 (vsFTPd 1.2.0)
Name (192.168.15.10:root): admin
530 Please login with USER and PASS.
SSL not available
331 Please specify the password.
Password:
230 Login successful.
Remote system type is UNIX.
Using binary mode to transfer files.
ftp> bin
200 Switching to Binary mode.
ftp> prompt
Interactive mode off.
ftp> hash
Hash mark printing on (1024 bytes/hash mark).
ftp> passive
Passive mode on.
ftp> ls
227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,15,10,6,16)
150 Here comes the directory listing.
drwxr-xr-x 8 501 501 4096 Jul 04 04:23 Service
-rw-r--r-- 1 501 501 37918648 Jul 03 21:34 ipso371build020.tgz
drwxr-xr-x 4 501 501 4096 Jul 04 03:53 replica_package
226 Directory send OK.
ftp>

On the FTP Server, this is what I am seeing:

[root@dca2-LinuxES root]# tcpdump -i eth0 -n host 198.147.14.60
tcpdump: listening on eth0
09:52:05.917006 198.147.14.60.50586 > 192.168.15.10.h323gatedisc: S 3181618356:3181618356(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 14945005 0,nop,wscale 2> (DF)
09:52:05.917058 192.168.15.10.h323gatedisc > 198.147.14.60.50586: S 1475061600:1475061600(0) ack 3181618357 win 5792 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 12209006 14945005,nop,wscale 0> (DF)
09:52:05.917998 198.147.14.60.50586 > 192.168.15.10.h323gatedisc: . ack 1 win 1460 <nop,nop,timestamp 14945005 12209006> (DF)
09:52:05.918140 198.147.14.60.56826 > 192.168.15.10.ftp: P 42:48(
09:52:13.172622 198.147.14.60.55101 > 192.168.15.10.gdp-port: . ack 1 win 1460 <nop,nop,timestamp 14945730 12209731> (DF)
09:52:13.172843 198.147.14.60.56826 > 192.168.15.10.ftp: P 150:156(6) ack 1386 win 1460 <nop,nop,timestamp 14945730 12209731> (DF) [tos 0x10]
09:52:13.173021 192.168.15.10.ftp > 198.147.14.60.56826: P 1386:1425(39) ack 156 win 5792 <nop,nop,timestamp 12209731 14945730> (DF)
09:52:13.173284 192.168.15.10.gdp-port > 198.147.14.60.55101: P 1:302(301) ack 1 win 5792 <nop,nop,timestamp 12209731 14945730> (DF) [tos 0x8]
09:52:13.173322 192.168.15.10.ftp > 198.147.14.60.56826: P 1425:1449(24) ack 156 win 5792 <nop,nop,timestamp 12209731 14945730> (DF)
09:52:13.173359 192.168.15.10.gdp-port > 198.147.14.60.55101: F 302:302(0) ack 1 win 5792 <nop,nop,timestamp 12209731 14945730> (DF) [tos 0x8]
09:52:13.174689 198.147.14.60.55101 > 192.168.15.10.gdp-port: . ack 302 win 1728 <nop,nop,timestamp 14945730 12209731> (DF) [tos 0x8]
09:52:13.175077 198.147.14.60.55101 > 192.168.15.10.gdp-port: F 1:1(0) ac
09:54:39.799188 198.147.14.60.59197 > 192.168.15.10.sa-msg-port: S 3337646170:3337646170(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 14960393 0,nop,wscale 2> (DF)
09:54:39.799262 192.168.15.10.sa-msg-port > 198.147.14.60.59197: S 1620672975:1620672975(0) ack 3337646171 win 5792 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 12224394 14960393,nop,wscale 0> (DF)
09:54:39.800184 198.147.14.60.59197 > 192.168.15.10.sa-msg-port: . ack 1 win 1460 <nop,nop,timestamp 14960393 12224394> (DF)
09:54:39.800330 198.147.14.60.45607 > 192.168.15.10.ftp: P 293:299(6) ack 2417 win 1460 <nop,nop,timestamp 14960393 12224394> (DF) [tos 0x10]
09:55:01.059062 198.147.14.60.39612 > 192.168.15.10.tftp-mcast: S 3363041828:3363041828(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 14962519 0,nop,wscale 2> (DF)
09:55:01.059142 192.168.15.10.tftp-mcast > 198.147.14.60.39612: S 1651134495:1651134495(0) ack 3363041829 win 5792 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 12226520 14962519,nop,wscale 0> (DF)
09:55:01.060111 198.147.14.60.39612 > 192.168.15.10.tftp-mcast: . ack 1 win 1460 <nop,nop,timestamp 14962519 12226520> (DF)
09:55:01.060259 198.147.14.60.45607 > 192.168.15.10.ftp: P 341:347(6) ack 2865 win 1460 <nop,nop,timestamp 14962519 12226520> (DF) [tos 0x10]
09:55:01.060471 192.168.15.10.ftp > 198.147.14.60.45607: P 2865:2904(39) ack 347 win 5792 <nop,nop,timestamp 12226520 14962519> (DF)
09:55:01.060761 192.168.15.10.tftp-mcast > 198.147.14.60.39612: P 1:302(301) ack 1 win 5792 <nop,nop,timestamp 12226520 14962519> (DF) [tos 0x8]
09:55:01.060801 192.168.15.10.ftp > 198.147.14.60.45607: P 2904:2928(24) ack 347 win 5792 <nop,nop,timestamp 12226520 14962519> (DF)
09:55:01.060843 192.168.15.10.tftp-mcast > 198.147.14.60.39612: F 302:302(0) ack 1 win 5792 <nop,nop,timestamp 12226520 14962519> (DF) [tos 0x8]
09:55:01.062162 198.147.14.60.39612 > 192.168.15.10.tftp-mcast: . ack 302 win 17

Why is SmartDefense NOT blocking "KNOWN PORTS"? So much for being
"Smart"?

Can someone explain this? Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 2007-09-05
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2007-06-04
Posts: 1,073
Rep Power: 3
mcnallym has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: SmartDefense and blocking FTP "known ports"

Just in case not worked out yet but known ports in Check Point terms is 0-1023 so your ports that specified are outside that range.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:06.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0