| CPUG | |
| The Check Point User Group | |
| A Resource For The Check Point Community. Fast. Useful. Independent. | |
|
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Hi guys. I recently bump into a problem: X11 traffic is not passing the firewall if is not explicitly defined. I other words, if I have a rule like this: Source x.x.x.x Destination y.y.y.y Service any the X11 traffic is not passing the firewall, unless is defined in a rule. Source x.x.x.x Destination y.y.y.y Service X11. The rule must be place above any other rule that permit service any, so no conflict will appear. So basicly, the X11 connection is in fact "Accepted" by the Rule Base, but is later rejected by another mechanism (called the Session Handler), which does not have any information about rule numbers. Regards, Phayder |
| |||
| hi, open the service object x11 and go to the advanced properties. Then set the "Match for any" option and reinstall the policy. After this change x11 is part of "any" and your rule will work as you expect. cheers stefan |
| |||
| That's normal behavior because X11 is considered a dangerous service since it can open a new back connection back into the network. That's why it is not included in "any" unless you explicitly put it there. The possible problem with doing so is that "any" anywhere in the rule base now includes X11 and it's just not that prevalent in usage. Ray |
| |||
| What? Just go to 'Policy -> Global Properties -> SmartDashboard Customization -> Configure -> FireWall-1 -> Stateful Inspection' and uncheck the 'reject_x11_in_any' checkbox. Then install your policy again. Glad to be of service, Danny Trommer CCSA/CCSE/CCSE+ |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |