CPUG

The Check Point User Group

A Resource For The Check Point Community.  Fast.  Useful.  Independent.

1. CCSA/CCSE One-Week Dual-Certification Training Course with CPUG in San Francisco!
    Courses Starting 12/8, (2009) 1/19, 2/9, 3/9, 4/6, 5/4, 6/8, 7/6, 8/3.
2. Join Us On LinkedIn - We now have a CPUG group.


Go Back   CPUG: The Check Point User Group > Check Point Firewall-1/VPN-1 Platforms > Nokia And IPSO
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2005-08-14
Administrator
 
Join Date: 2005-08-11
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 582
Rep Power: 10
BarryStiefel has disabled reputation
Default Does NAT function differently on Nokia platform?

Does NAT function differently on Nokia platform?



Sometimes on an IPSO platform, FireWall-1 will route before address translation occurs in 4.1 or in NG when the "Translate destination on client side" option is checked.

You have uncovered an idiosyncrasy of NAT on the Nokia platform. Check Point did not mean for it to happen this way, it is just how the code works out on Nokia. NAT is sometimes done by the time the packet is routed by the OS. Note that this is only on the Nokia platform and has not proven 100% reliable. You should still add the necessary static route or check the "Translate Destination on client side" checkbox to insure that it does work 100% of the time.

-- PhoneBoy - 01 Jan 2004

FAQForm FAQs.Class: NetworkAddressTranslationFAQs, TroubleshootingFAQs FAQs.OS: OsNokiaIPSO FAQs.Version:
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 13:44.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0