CPUG

The Check Point User Group

A Resource For The Check Point Community.  Fast.  Useful.  Independent.

1. Come to CPUG CON 2008 EUROPE in Switzerland on September 8th - 9th!
    Two days full of technical content for Check Point administrators in the beautiful Swiss Alps!
    We already have sign-ups from twelve different countries!
2. CCSA/CCSE One-Week Dual-Certification Training Course with CPUG in San Francisco!
    Courses Starting 7/14, 8/25, 10/6, 11/3, 12/8, (2009) 1/19, 2/9, 3/9, 4/6, 5/4, 6/8.
3. Corrent S3500 SecureXL Turbocards For Sale - Last Six Remaining - Get Your Spares!
4. Join Us On LinkedIn - We now have a CPUG group.


Go Back   CPUG: The Check Point User Group > Check Point Firewall-1/VPN-1 And Related Products > NAT (Network Address Translation)
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2008-04-16
sebastan_bach sebastan_bach is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2005-10-12
Posts: 257
Rep Power: 3
sebastan_bach has an average reputation (10+)
Send a message via Yahoo to sebastan_bach
Default problem with manual static nat

hi am i am having NGXR65 and i have configured manual static nat .

i have a policy permitting telnet traffic from any to the static nat address.

in my global properties i have enabled manual nat rules
translate destination on client side.

my internal host is 10.1.1.254 and my static nat address is 60.1.1.1.
my external host is 1.1.1.2.firewall internal interface is in the same subnet of the internal host and the external host is in the same subnet of the external interface of the firewall.

on firewall i have a default route pointing to the external host.

here;s are my nat rules.

rule 1

in the original packet
source inside-host(10.1.1.254) destination any service any

in the translated packet
source static-host(60.1.1.1) destination any service any

rule2

in the translated packet
destination statichost(60.1.1.1) source any service any

in the original packet
destination insidehost(10.1.1.254) source any service any

i guess i am missing out on the proxy arp entires in the firewall.

can someone pls point me out in the right direction for this. and also tell me how to add proxy arp entries in the firewall.

waiting for some reply. i am stuck with this for quite some time.

i got the same thing achieved with auto-nat but not able to get it working with manual nat.

regards

sebastan
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 2008-04-17
abusharif abusharif is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-04-27
Location: Twillight zone
Posts: 434
Rep Power: 3
abusharif has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: problem with manual static nat

if its nokia platform, you add them via voyager, ARP menu

if its splat you can add them via regular linux command

arp -s 1.1.1.1 xx:xx:xx:xx pub

where xx:xx:xx:xx is the mac address of your external interface and 1.1.1.1 is the public IP you want to use for NAT

or

arp -s 1.1.1.1 eth0 pub

where eth0 is example of name of the external interface

Last edited by abusharif; 2008-04-17 at 01:03.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 2008-04-18
sebastan_bach sebastan_bach is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2005-10-12
Posts: 257
Rep Power: 3
sebastan_bach has an average reputation (10+)
Send a message via Yahoo to sebastan_bach
Default Re: problem with manual static nat

hi abu thanks a lot for ur reply. u mean to say everytime i have a manual static nat i will have to add a manual arp entry in the firewall.

in my scenario if u see that the static nat address is not in the same subnet of the external interface of the firewall. so when the outside device does a AND operation for reaching 60.1.1.1 which is the static nat of the internal host. the deivce knows that 60.1.1.1 is in different network so will do a arp for the external interface of the gateway itself right. cause on the outside device i have a route for 60.1.1.1 pointing to the external interface of the firewall.

so can u pls tell me why do we need the arp entry on the firewall cause the packet will be send to the firewall by the external device.

is the requirement of the firewall to accept a packet for a static nat address it needs a manual arp entry.

but then i find it ridiculous cause if i have 100 manual static nat entries i will have to add 100 manual aro entries as well on the firewall.

cause in cisco asa when firewall automatically accepts frames and does proxy-arp for static nat addresses .

waiting for ur reply mate.

thanks once again.

regards

sebastan
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0