CPUG

The Check Point User Group

A Resource For The Check Point Community.  Fast.  Useful.  Independent.

1. Come to CPUG CON 2008 EUROPE in Switzerland on September 8th - 9th!
    Two days full of technical content for Check Point administrators in the beautiful Swiss Alps!
    We already have 72 attendees signed up from 20 countries!
2. CCSA/CCSE One-Week Dual-Certification Training Course with CPUG in San Francisco!
    Courses Starting 10/6, 11/3, 12/8, (2009) 1/19, 2/9, 3/9, 4/6, 5/4, 6/8, 7/6, 8/3, 9/7.
3. Corrent S3500 SecureXL Turbocards For Sale - Last Six Remaining - Get Your Spares!
4. Join Us On LinkedIn - We now have a CPUG group.


Go Back   CPUG: The Check Point User Group > Check Point Firewall-1/VPN-1 And Related Products > NAT (Network Address Translation)
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2007-12-04
Kenny_NL Kenny_NL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-10-30
Location: Arnhem, The Netherlands
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 0
Kenny_NL has an average reputation (10+)
Default Firewall-on-a-stick (with NAT)?

Would it be possible to use the firewall merely as a routing/natting device, with policy-rules to regulate traffic?

The problem is this:
We have a firewall-cluster with one subnet to connect partner-networks. This subnet is divided in private VLAN's on the (Cisco) access-switches. We want to connect a new partner (partnerA), to give it access to a server. The problem is, that this server is still located at partnerB, and NAT has to be used. This server will be at our location in the near future and then this issue will be resolved, but in the mean time we're kinda stuck with this.

The NATting will be done by the firewalls (R55), and it also has to route the packets. With this setup, there is only one interface used (the external one), because of the private VLAN-setup.

Does Checkpoint have the ability to do this, or would it be easier to connect PartnerA to a separate interface during this transition-period?

Any help would be appreciated...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 2007-12-04
mcnallym mcnallym is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2007-06-04
Posts: 993
Rep Power: 2
mcnallym has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: Firewall-on-a-stick (with NAT)?

You need to go through one interface and out the other to apply the security policy.

This could be a VLANned interface with the sub-interfaces as Check Point treats these as seperate interfaces. Each VLAN having it's own IP address. Whilst they are physically 1 interface Check Point sees each VLAN as a seperate interface, so you no longer have just one interface

However you could not have one interface with 1 IP address and that being the total interfaces and IP addresses.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0