| CPUG | |
| The Check Point User Group | |
| A Resource For The Check Point Community. Fast. Useful. Independent. | |
|
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| I know it sounds confusing from the subject, but I've always been told that having a group objects within a group object used in a NAT rule can seriously bog down the firewall. Has anyone else heard this or experienced it? Thanks! |
| |||
| That was true 5 or so years ago. Today as long as the group size is sane (500 or so objects total) it shouldn't be a problem. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |