CPUG

The Check Point User Group

A Resource For The Check Point Community.  Fast.  Useful.  Independent.

1. Come to CPUG CON 2008 EUROPE in Switzerland on September 8th - 9th!
    Two days full of technical content for Check Point administrators in the beautiful Swiss Alps!
    We already have 72 attendees signed up from 20 countries!
2. CCSA/CCSE One-Week Dual-Certification Training Course with CPUG in San Francisco!
    Courses Starting 10/6, 11/3, 12/8, (2009) 1/19, 2/9, 3/9, 4/6, 5/4, 6/8, 7/6, 8/3, 9/7.
3. Corrent S3500 SecureXL Turbocards For Sale - Last Six Remaining - Get Your Spares!
4. Join Us On LinkedIn - We now have a CPUG group.


Go Back   CPUG: The Check Point User Group > Check Point Firewall-1/VPN-1 And Related Products > NAT (Network Address Translation)
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2006-07-03
linuxsrc linuxsrc is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-01-25
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 0
linuxsrc has an average reputation (10+)
Default IP POOL NAT Question

Configurating the RemoteAccess VPN using IP POOL NAT, defined the IP POOL for NAT, and the SecuRemote client can 'ping' the Internal interface of the firewall, but can not 'ping' other Internal machines.

I can see the 'echo request' from NATed Internal IP address of SecuRemote client, and the internal host send 'arp' request to the firewall, the firewall recievie the arp request, but the firewall do not answer the request.

What's the reason? anyone can help me? thanks.

Linuxsrc
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 2006-07-03
pavan_lotus pavan_lotus is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-07-03
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
pavan_lotus has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: IP POOL NAT Question

hi does any one know , how to connect VPN between PIX and Checkpoint...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 2006-07-31
brycec brycec is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-06-15
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
brycec has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: IP POOL NAT Question

A possible answer for linuxsrc...

Have you defined your encryption domain on the firewall?
In global properties for the firewall object will be a VPN section in which you need to define your encryption domain. You have two options, create a group object of ip ranges or simply choose the default option which means the firewalls encryption domain is every interface on the firewall (except the external one).
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 2006-08-01
northlandboy northlandboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-07-28
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 787
Rep Power: 3
northlandboy has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: IP POOL NAT Question

Why is the internal host sending an ARP request? Why not define your IP Pool as a network that doesn't physically exist anywhere on the network, then set up the network to route to the firewall to get to that network. That way the internal hosts will simply route their traffic to the firewall, it will intercept the traffic, and de-NAT it/encrypt it to send it back to the client.

Is the firewall configured to do proxy ARP otherwise? If it's not, why would it respond to an ARP request for an IP it's not configured to ARP for?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 20:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0