| CPUG | |
| The Check Point User Group | |
| A Resource For The Check Point Community. Fast. Useful. Independent. | |
|
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Hi I remember in 4.1 for state sync you used to do put keys between the interfaces. So, in NG & NGX put keys have been replaced by sic. If sic failed on the member of a cluster would the state tables continue being kept up to date. Not sure wether sic only covers management to gateway communication or sync to sync. I guess if it doesnt cover sync to sync what did checkpoint use to replace the putkeys. Thanks "Birmingham" |
| |||
| I would say as long as you already have one active policy on the "sic unreachable" cluster member with defined sync interfaces it doesnt matter if u loose sic to smartcenter after that. Logging etc will not work but sync information is afaik not dependened of sic to smartcenter. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |