CPUG

The Check Point User Group

A Resource For The Check Point Community.  Fast.  Useful.  Independent.

1. Come to CPUG CON 2008 EUROPE in Switzerland on September 8th - 9th!
    Two days full of technical content for Check Point administrators in the beautiful Swiss Alps!
    We already have 52 attendees signed up from 14 countries!
2. CCSA/CCSE One-Week Dual-Certification Training Course with CPUG in San Francisco!
    Courses Starting 8/25, 10/6, 11/3, 12/8, (2009) 1/19, 2/9, 3/9, 4/6, 5/4, 6/8, 7/6, 8/3, 9/7.
3. Corrent S3500 SecureXL Turbocards For Sale - Last Six Remaining - Get Your Spares!
4. Join Us On LinkedIn - We now have a CPUG group.


Go Back   CPUG: The Check Point User Group > Check Point Firewall-1/VPN-1 And Related Products > Miscellaneous
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2006-06-23
stefanjuon@yahoo.com stefanjuon@yahoo.com is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-06-23
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
stefanjuon@yahoo.com has an average reputation (10+)
Default Interface state unknown using fw monitor

Why is the interface eth6.98, which should be choosen as outgoing interface
for traffic from 192.168.158.180 to 192.168.140.230, printed out as
unknown? Is there any configuration missing? Note: eth6.98 is the one
and only vlan on eth6.

[Expert@fw]# fw monitor -e 'accept dst=192.168.140.230;'
monitor: getting filter (from command line)
monitor: compiling
monitorfilter:
Compiled OK.
monitor: loading
monitor: monitoring (control-C to stop)
eth0:i[75]: 192.168.158.180 -> 192.168.140.230 (UDP) len=75 id=27675
UDP: 4760 -> 161
UNKNOWN:o[75]: 192.168.158.180 -> 192.168.140.230 (UDP) len=75 id=27675
UDP: 4760 -> 161

cphaprob -a if:
...
eth6 DOWN (89.7 secs)non sync(non secured), multicast (eth6.98 )
...

So eth6 seems to be somehow not properly working, even it is recognized by cphaprod.

Version: NGX R60 on Secure Platform, Cluster XL

Cheers, Stefan

Last edited by stefanjuon@yahoo.com; 2006-06-23 at 06:01.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 2008-03-07
Tan Da Boss Tan Da Boss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: 2007-04-11
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 2
Tan Da Boss has an average reputation (10+)
Send a message via MSN to Tan Da Boss
Default Re: Interface state unknown using fw monitor

Hi Stephan,

one of my customers has a similar issue.
he is using Nortel Contivity for specific users and this VPN tunnel passes through his Check Point Site to Site VPN (so VPN inside VPN). No VLAN define on the interfaces.
This architecture was working with NG AI R55 and since the R62 migration, he has had this issue.
In the fwmonitor, we can see unknown interface on the outgoing interface.
We are still troubleshooting this issue without any clue. Maybe CP'TAC will find something.
As a workaround we use a GRE tunnel to replace the Site to Site VPN.

Has anybody encountered this issue also?

Thx

Tan
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 21:30.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0