CPUG

The Check Point User Group

A Resource For The Check Point Community.  Fast.  Useful.  Independent.

1. CCSA/CCSE One-Week Dual-Certification Training Course with CPUG in San Francisco!
    Courses Starting (2009) 1/19, 2/9, 3/9, 4/6, 5/4, 6/8, 7/6, 8/3.
2. Join Us On LinkedIn - We now have a CPUG group.


Go Back   CPUG: The Check Point User Group > Check Point Firewall-1/VPN-1 And Related Products > Clustering (Security Gateway HA and ClusterXL)
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2008-02-08
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-12-06
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
Artman has an average reputation (10+)
Default Using Floodgate in an active-active cluster

I'm interested in using QoS on a load balanced Splat R65 cluster. Is it necessary that the interfaces names align? For instance; if eth0 is our internal interface on one cluster member, must the other cluster have its internal interface on eth 0 in order to setup QoS?

If so, what is the best method for changing the interface names (vs. repatching and changing the interfaces manually.

Thanks in advance!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 2008-02-08
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2005-08-29
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,681
Rep Power: 5
chillyjim has an average reputation (10+)
Send a message via AIM to chillyjim Send a message via Skype™ to chillyjim
Default Re: Using Floodgate in an active-active cluster

Yes it is. They should align for ClusterXL in general
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:23.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0