CPUG

The Check Point User Group

A Resource For The Check Point Community.  Fast.  Useful.  Independent.

1. CCSA/CCSE One-Week Dual-Certification Training Course with CPUG in San Francisco!
    Courses Starting 12/8, (2009) 1/19, 2/9, 3/9, 4/6, 5/4, 6/8, 7/6, 8/3.
2. Join Us On LinkedIn - We now have a CPUG group.


Go Back   CPUG: The Check Point User Group > Check Point Firewall-1/VPN-1 And Related Products > Clustering (Security Gateway HA and ClusterXL)
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2007-03-01
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-07-14
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 0
pedroboavida has an average reputation (10+)
Default Sync problem

Hi,

I have a (hot-standby) cluster of firewalls running Checkpoint NG FP2 on Sun Solaris with Sync only. The cluster part is done by a third party software. In cpconfig the cluster xl/state sync is activated and when I run "cpstat ha" I get the following output:

Product name: High Availability
Version: NG Feature Pack 2
Status: problem
HA installed: 1
Working mode: Sync only
HA started: yes

I have a secured interface where state sync is done and the cluster object at the management use precisely this network to do state sync.

If I run the "cphastart -d" command I get the following output:

[ 736]@fw-node1 ha_fetch_callback: could not take fail over track mode from cluster. continue anyway /opt/CPfw1-50/bin/cphaconf clear-secured /opt/CPfw1-50/bin/cphaconf clear-disconnected
/opt/CPfw1-50/bin/cphaconf -i 1 -n 30 -c 2 -m 1 -l 0 -t sbif0 -p 1172575817 -b 1085418207 start

Any clues ?

Thanks in advance,

PB
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 2007-05-12
Member
 
Join Date: 2006-12-20
Posts: 83
Rep Power: 2
NickBrandson has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: Sync problem

Persoally, I don't think the cphastart or alike would work for "Syn-only" environment.

Possibly it is misconfigured your "3rd party" Cluster/HA solution

Consult SB or Rain SE for details.

Actually, it is recommended to "upgrade" to ClusterXL instead, i think both OPSEC-Cluster vendors are cutting the support for the products anymore.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:44.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0