CPUG

The Check Point User Group

A Resource For The Check Point Community.  Fast.  Useful.  Independent.

1. Come to CPUG CON 2008 EUROPE in Switzerland on September 8th - 9th!
    Two days full of technical content for Check Point administrators in the beautiful Swiss Alps!
    We already have 52 attendees signed up from 14 countries!
2. CCSA/CCSE One-Week Dual-Certification Training Course with CPUG in San Francisco!
    Courses Starting 8/25, 10/6, 11/3, 12/8, (2009) 1/19, 2/9, 3/9, 4/6, 5/4, 6/8, 7/6, 8/3, 9/7.
3. Corrent S3500 SecureXL Turbocards For Sale - Last Six Remaining - Get Your Spares!
4. Join Us On LinkedIn - We now have a CPUG group.


Go Back   CPUG: The Check Point User Group > Check Point Firewall-1/VPN-1 Platforms > Check Point VPN-1 Edge Appliances
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2006-05-10
plingema plingema is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-05-10
Location: Toronto,Canada
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
plingema has an average reputation (10+)
Default Securemote access ip conflict issue

Hello,,

I have many small offices with edge XU 5.90-6.0 that would like to utilize vpn server option for vpn client access for small number of users. Question, is there anyway to nat pool or hide nat inbound vpn client connections to internal LAN ip to prevent home network ip range conflicting with internal?

Or do i have ensure home networks don't overlap with internal lan?

Thanks,,,any help appreciated,,I suspect no solution other then having home network setup on isp reg ip?

thanks,,
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 2006-05-10
andrew andrew is offline
Member
 
Join Date: 2006-03-25
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 0
andrew has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: Securemote access ip conflict issue

Even if you could NAT them when passing through the FW, if the networks overlap, how will SecuRemote know when data is intended for the user's LAN or for the office networks?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 2006-05-12
plingema plingema is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-05-10
Location: Toronto,Canada
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
plingema has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: Securemote access ip conflict issue

Let me expand:

the office encryption domain is 10.20.110.0/22 the remote users only need access to that network. The internal gateway or choke router for that network also receives network routing for entire WAN which may include subnets that overlap home user networks. My thought was that if i could hide nat(home user) then I could avoid the issue of return packet routing issues?

The remote user would have no requirement for access to the identical subnet if it existed within the WAN. ie: 192.168.0.xxx (NOW why that subnet is in the WAN ??? , who knows, I support, I did not design)

I don't think I can do anything except either have home user change subnet or block route from choke router? just getting second opinion,,,,thanks for quick response though..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:44.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0