CPUG

The Check Point User Group

A Resource For The Check Point Community.  Fast.  Useful.  Independent.

1. CCSA/CCSE One-Week Dual-Certification Training Course with CPUG in San Francisco!
    Courses Starting (2009) 1/19, 2/9, 3/9, 4/6, 5/4, 6/8, 7/6, 8/3.
2. Join Us On LinkedIn - We now have a CPUG group.


Go Back   CPUG: The Check Point User Group > Check Point Firewall-1/VPN-1 Platforms > Check Point SecurePlatform (SPLAT)
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2008-10-16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-09-26
Posts: 856
Rep Power: 3
cciesec2006 has an average reputation (10+)
Default Memory usage in NGx R65

I have two different NGx R65 clusters running SPLAT on IBM x3650 servers,
dual quad-core processors 3.16 Ghz with 4GB RAM. All of the servers
are running NGx R65 with HFA_02 and hf_249. These gateways are
managed by SPLAT Provider-1 NGx R65 with HFA_02 and hf-249.

on cluster#1, there is NO traffics running through these gateways,
when running top, I see only about 200Mb of FREE memory on both
gw1 and gw2.

on cluster#2, there is NO traffics running through these gateways,
when running top, I see about 3.8GB of FREE memory on both gw1 and
gw2.

Question is, why such big differences between these two clusters in
terms of memory usage?

When I applied HFA_30 on both cluster #1 and cluster #2, I see only about
100MB of FREE memory on ALL of the gateways but that is another
discussion for another day.

Can anyone explain how NGx R65 allocates memory? It makes no sense to
me. Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 2008-10-17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2007-07-16
Posts: 693
Rep Power: 2
Thorpuse has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: Memory usage in NGx R65

The question is probably not how it allocates memory, but how it displays free memory. As someone from CP tried to explain, VPN-1 pre-caches memory and marks it as used for certain functions, even though it's actually free. I'd like to find the right set of commands to show actual memory use, because it's standard mode of operation looks like it's sucking memory like no-one's business.

I'd suggest a support call about that though - sounds like something is going funny at the OS level.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:15.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0