CPUG

The Check Point User Group

A Resource For The Check Point Community.  Fast.  Useful.  Independent.

1. CCSA/CCSE One-Week Dual-Certification Training Course with CPUG in San Francisco!
    Courses Starting (2009) 1/19, 2/9, 3/9, 4/6, 5/4, 6/8, 7/6, 8/3.
2. Join Us On LinkedIn - We now have a CPUG group.


Go Back   CPUG: The Check Point User Group > Check Point Firewall-1/VPN-1 Platforms > Check Point SecurePlatform (SPLAT)
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 2008-07-03
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-10-23
Posts: 170
Rep Power: 3
Danielpb has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: Invalid message id (NGX R60)

This might help with the super netting issues:

NOTE BACKUP ALL FILES BEFORE MAKING ANY CHANGES.

If your using communities then you try changing the setting to per host instead of subnet. Sometime this resolves the issues with out performing the steps below.


-------------

The problem is that Check Point using super netmasking, and the cisco can't read correctly this encryption domains.
To resolve this issue follow my instruction:

1.Change to environment to specific CMA 2.backup file objects_5_0.C that found in dir of current CMA conf 3.stop the current CMA 4.edit objects_5_0.C
Change the value of :ike_use_largest_possible_subnets (true)
to
:ike_use_largest_possible_subnets (false) 5.start the current CMA 6.push the policy

Best Regards,
================================================== ================================================== ===============

To resolve this supernetting issue, configure the max_subnet_for_range table in $FWDIR/lib/user.def on the Management Server (SmartCenter).

Modifying user.def file to manually define networks to encrypt traffic to/from
Backup $FWDIR\lib\user.def file.

Edit $FWDIR\lib\user.def file:

Sample 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

#ifndef __user_def__
#define __user_def__

//
// User defined INSPECT code
//

max_subnet_for_range = {
<0.0.0.0, 194.29.39.255; 255.255.255.0>,
<194.29.40.0, 194.29.50.255; 255.255.255.255>,
<194.29.51.0, 255.255.255.255; 255.255.0.0>
};

#endif
Ex

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Example 1, the configuration would work in the following way:
- For the host IP 194.29.23.1 the network IP would be 194.29.23.0/24
- For the host IP 194.29.46.45 the network IP would be 194.29.46.45 (just one IP)
- For the host IP 194.29.102.1 the network IP would be 194.29.0.0/16
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:05.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0