CPUG

The Check Point User Group

A Resource For The Check Point Community.  Fast.  Useful.  Independent.

1. CCSA/CCSE One-Week Dual-Certification Training Course with CPUG in San Francisco!
    Courses Starting (2009) 1/19, 2/9, 3/9, 4/6, 5/4, 6/8, 7/6, 8/3.
2. Join Us On LinkedIn - We now have a CPUG group.


Go Back   CPUG: The Check Point User Group > Check Point Certifications And Exams > CCSE (Check Point Certified Security Expert) > CCSE NGX Exam 156-315.1
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2008-07-28
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-09-18
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 0
Afontanilla has an average reputation (10+)
Default Sychronization question driving me Crazy

Ok everyone here has their own opinion on this controversial type of question.

What is the best way to view full state synchronization?

well there you can either use the cphaprob -i list command( see a list of critical devices on cluster member:show state of internal (interfaces, HA inialization and so on)

or the fw ctl pstat command (which show hash system kernal memory, packets inspected, drefragmented, encryption stats, nat stats and state synchorinization stats) Well state state sychronization statistics is fine and dandy but does it show full state sycnhronization.

well from Checkpoint documentation the (Cphaprob state) command shows the status of full state synchronization. If it was between CPAhaprob state and fw ctl pstat I would choose cpahaprob state(too bad it doesn't ask this).

Which is it?!!!!!$!!$???!??!$!$!$?$?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 2008-07-28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-07-28
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 862
Rep Power: 3
northlandboy has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: Sychronization question driving me Crazy

Personally I use a combo of "cpstat ha" and "fw tab -t connections -s" on both nodes of the cluster.

If the connection tables are close in value, then that to me is the best confirmation that sync is working.

I'd probably use the other commands to dig around further if I saw some problem with the output of the above two commands.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 2008-07-31
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-09-18
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 0
Afontanilla has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: Sychronization question driving me Crazy

Ok i finally found the answer from Checkpoint themselves..

The question ask which command showsfull state synchronization?

the answer is:...

fw ctl pstat
Because:
Checkpoint hilights this command when it comes to finding out which command shows the status of sychronization.. It also shows statistics such as sync packets received, dropped, sent ....in detail


The only other viable command is cphaprob -i list but his is not 100% correct. This command shows internal interface synchronization status..but fw ctl pstat gives a more comphrehensive answer when it comes to device sychronization.


Of course there are about a couple of other commands that would work...but none of them are directly listed in the question ...ie cphaprob state etc.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 2008-07-31
Junior Member
 
Join Date: 2006-09-18
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 0
Afontanilla has an average reputation (10+)
Default Re: Sychronization question driving me Crazy

Actually the best way to test this is:
1. Go to work, ssh into one of your cluster members and type the commands and output them to a text file and judge for yourself.
2. get qty 2 secureplatform servers or my favorite an qty 2 ol Nokia IP330s. Slap a version of r60 on them and have a smartserver on hand. Setup clusterXL and Nokia VRRP and go to step 1.

Its funny how Nokia came out with functionality that was presents years ago, that only now Checkpoint is introducing as brand new R65 features..I guess nokia is being edged out with the new checpoint edge products....


For example: Dynamic routing protocol support was present on the Nokia platfrom back when Checkpoint 4.1 was out (OSPF BGP)..now Checkpoint r65 charges you extra to have dynamic routing support on secureplatform Pro...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 2008-08-05
Member
 
Join Date: 2007-04-11
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 2
Tan Da Boss has an average reputation (10+)
Send a message via MSN to Tan Da Boss
Default Re: Sychronization question driving me Crazy

Dynamic routing was introduced with NGX R60 but you're right Nokia has proposed these functionnalities much sooner than CP.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 23:25.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0