Re: Dynamic objects...Have I got the wrong idea So I want to create a Global rule that allows my "Admin-Subnet" HTTPS and SSH access to the firewall itself. I was hoping to have the rule as: Source: Admin-Subnet Destination: DynamicObject_Firewall So instead of creating a group with all the firewalls in it, I have one Dynamic Object that recognizes when the global policy is on Firewall A, the destination would be to Firewall A. That way, when a new security gateway is added to SmartDashboard, it is already inherently in that Dynamic Object, I don't have to add it to a Simple Group. It sounds like I would have to go to each firewall and add a host entry that is DynamicObject_Firewall 10.1.1.1 (or whatever that specific firewall Management IP address is?) Doesn't this just move all the work from the SmartDashboard to the secure gateway itself? |